Helix Vs Quad CortexThe helix is just such a huge and heavy form factor compared to a switcher and IMO even the helix could use more loops. Whereas the capture is already comparable to the premier product on the market which has had no competition since its introduction. Anyway, they seem to be doing exactly what most people in the modeling world want: Combining modeling and profiling (err amp capturing) in one unit and spraying massive amounts of CPU power icing onto that already delicious cake. It sounds fantastic in demos I just can’t justify the price for my situation. For example, I love recto tones. Amazing tones (amps and fx), great form factor, build like a tank, genius switch configuration, almost total control of parameter via modifiers, Astonishing depth for tweak the tone. While the Quad Cortex does support an external pedal, you have to purchase it separately and add it to your model. The Quad Cortex is designed to effectively be a pedalboard, on top of being an amplifier and audio interface. The Cortex Cloud is cool because you can download amp and pedal captures that other users have shared, but some are better than others. well of course not you guys, y’all have golden ears. I think QC sounds richer overall, but Helix has quite a bit going for it operationally, Helix Edit, and many more options for now. At just 290 x 190 x 50mm, the Quad Cortex has a smaller footprint than most pedalboards and is compact enough to fit inside the main pocket of a Mono M80 gigbag, making it ideal for travelling musicians. PS: I find Quad Cortex. There’s a big difference in the price tag between in HX Stomp and the Quad Cortex, but the UI looks miles ahead based off of the videos I have watched. If you assign a midi command to a switch, it gets fired off regardless of what mode you're in. It’s like $800 cheaper to go Helix. If you assign a midi command to a switch, it gets fired off regardless of. Quad Cortex vs Helix vs Kemper - A Guitarist's Guide Published on 16 September 2022 Are you considering a digital modeller for playing, recording or gigging? If so, stick the kettle on and have a sit down for ten minutes, because I may be able to offer some insights! I have a long history with digital modellers. The quad cortex should be interesting, and they've hinted that they want to release a matching native app when that comes. $600 less than a quad cortex. The Cortex Cloud is cool because you can download amp and pedal captures that other users have shared, but some are better than others. In rotation: the Quad Cortex’s clever footswitches act as rotaries too At just 290 x 190 x 50mm, the Quad Cortex has a smaller footprint than most pedalboards and is compact enough to fit inside the main pocket of a Mono M80 gigbag, making it ideal for travelling musicians. As compared to the Kemper, this is a big plus as the knobs on Kemper can be very intimidating sometimes. With a total of 6 cores (4x SHARC+ and 2x ARM Cortex-A5 running at 500MHz each), this ludicrous amount of processing capacity provides limitless sound design possibilities. longevity - quad cortex is the new kid on the block and so might have a longer life span, especially when it comes. The quad is also smaller and hate to say cooler and just all around more as I said amp like in feel. The Quad Cortex tends to have more convincing amp tones but if you don't care for the whole modeler and in-ears setup, switching units isn't going to fix that. Even if the effects choices are a little bland and limited compared with the Kemper and the Helix, the actual sounds themselves are pretty spectacular. Neural DSP has issued an update for. Helix Quad Cortex and HX Effects ? Welcome to the Line 6 forums! Apply to Join our Public Beta Testing Program! IMPORTANT SAFETY ALERT: RELAY® G10 TRANSMITTER FIRE HAZARD Limited Support of Legacy Products Impact of Global Materials Shortage Quad Cortex and HX Effects ? By spikey, February 16, 2021in Helix Share More sharing options. In rotation: the Quad Cortex’s clever footswitches act as rotaries too At just 290 x 190 x 50mm, the Quad Cortex has a smaller footprint than most pedalboards and is compact enough to fit inside the. As compared to the Kemper, this is a big plus as the knobs on Kemper can be very. Both great units but I barely use them. 1K subscribers For TrueFire courses and All Access Memberships:. People really like Helix and/or Kemper, and their preferences are shaped by the genres they play, the workflows they like and other factors that may or may not apply to you. I do think Helix is way way better than anything Line 6 has put out before. Orange Terror Stamp + Perfect for the menu-averse. The quad is also smaller and hate to say cooler and just all around more as I said amp like in feel. OK, so this isn’t technically an FRFR speaker – it’s actually a powered PA speaker – but it does a great job when paired with something like a Helix or Headrush. In terms of the fidelity and feel of the amps, it's more 'open' and 'full' than most of the Helix models, and the way models respond to playing dynamics seems more subtle and more rich than other top-flight units. You can use the same things you'd use on your interface. Neural DSP Quad Cortex One of the bigger conceptual things to think about when choosing a modeler is the difference between an open ecosystem and a closed one. 43K views 1 year ago #QuadCortex #Helix In this video we will share a direct comparison between the Line 6 Helix Floor vs the Neural DSP Quad Cortex. Show chat replay THE ULTIMATE HYBRID RIG | Using Neural DSP Plugins with the. Even if the QC's modeling were more fleshed out, they are very different in terms of use and key features; QC is much more likely to compete more directly with Helix or FM3 in people's minds. When I see a Helix Floor, I don't wonder if it's a GT1000 or a Headrush or an AXE FX or a Space Station. 8K 94K views 3 months ago #quadcortex #andertons #kemper Testing and. Aug 23, 2021. Quad Cortex vs Kemper vs Helix - A Quick Blindfold Tone Comparison Andertons Music Co 823K subscribers Subscribe 1. I'm leaning between Helix, Axe FX3 (FM3) or Quad Cortex. I loved the fact that the Helix ecosystem has the Helix Native which you get in a great discount when buying one of the Helix products. Kemper vs Quad Cortex vs Helix (you can't tell the difference!) ToneJunkie TV 27. I am using audioengine a2+ ( I know they aren’t. First of all we will hear the units in. Quad Cortex vs Kemper vs Helix - A Quick Blindfold Tone Comparison Andertons Music Co 823K subscribers Subscribe 1. Neural DSP Quad Cortex. How does a quad vortex work? I’m looking at getting a quad cortex and the only thing I have used is the neural DSP plugins. One of the bigger conceptual things to think about when choosing a modeler is the difference between an open ecosystem and a closed one. I’ve never had amps or cabs so I’m not sure how it works. The Friedman BE on the other hand is great in the Helix. The QC can even act as its own interface. Check Today’s Price Final Thoughts on the Neural DSP Quad Cortex We had a lot of fun experimenting with the Neural DSP Quad Cortex. The 7-inch-wide touchscreen allows the user to control everything at their fingertips, adding immensely to a positive user experience. The best floorboard FX modelers on the market for all budgets, including gear from Line 6, Boss, and Neural DSP Included in this guide: 1 Neural DSP Quad Cortex Check Price 2 Line 6 Helix LT Check Price 3 Boss GX-100 Check Price 4 Boss GT-1000 Check Price 5 Line 6 Helix HX Effects Check Price 6 TC Electronic Plethora X5 Check Price 7 Zoom G5N. If you care more about all other effects get the Helix. Plus, I don’t really have the budget for an AxeFX III and to keep my Kemper. Our pick of the best FRFR speakers for Helix, Kemper, Quad Cortex and other digital amp and effects modellers Included in this guide: 1 Headrush FRFR-112 Check Price 2 Laney LFR-212 Check Price 3 Line 6 Powercab 112 Check Price 4 Kemper Power Kabinet View 5 Friedman ASC-10 View 6 Boss Katana-100 MkII Check Price 7 Line 6 Powercab 212 Plus. It would be $800 to get to an AxeFX III. My idea was that my budget would be about $400 for the move to a Quad Cortex. There are so many thousands of available settings that it. The quad cortex comes with a huge touch screen which is about 7 inches wide. Thats because the HX Stomp is trying to pack in all the stuff from the Full Helix with less controls. We both agreed pretty emphatically that the Helix sounded better. While the Quad Cortex does support an external pedal, you have to purchase it separately and add it to your model. The full Helix is less reliant on menus because of the additional dial, larger screen, and the capacitive buttons are way more useful since there are significantly more. OK, so this isn’t technically an FRFR speaker – it’s actually a powered PA speaker – but it does a great job when paired with something like a Helix or Headrush. >> Click to read more << Accordingly, does the Quad Cortex have a looper? Neural DSP adds a looper to the Quad Cortex in comprehensive new update. I thought the Quad Cortex might be a perfect device for me, but as I dig into it, I seem it’s missing a good complement of effects. Really, the L6 designers should be proud of themselves. When compared to similar models in the market, the Line 6 is slightly more affordable and has better support since Helix is an established brand. Quad Cortex vs Helix vs Kemper - A Guitarist's Guide Published on 16 September 2022 Are you considering a digital modeller for playing, recording or gigging? If so, stick the kettle on and have a sit down for ten minutes, because I may be able to offer some insights! I have a long history with digital modellers. The Helix series is a little more affordable than the Quad Cortex. outside in profiles like Kemper. It’s one of the most powerful modellers around at the moment (I’m sure competitors will catch up). I think the biggest difference is that for the most part, all the amps sound great on Fractal gear (if they're your taste of course) Whereas with the Helix, some are great, some not so much. On your Quad Cortex, open the Directory and navigate to the Impulse Responses folder beneath Cloud Directories. People really like Helix and/or Kemper, and their preferences are shaped by the genres they play, the workflows they like and other factors that may or may not apply to you. Quad Cortex vs Kemper vs Helix - A Quick Blindfold Tone Comparison Andertons Music Co 823K subscribers Subscribe 1. Although designed primarily for guitarists and bassists, the Quad Cortex can also be used for processing vocals, keyboards, and many other acoustic instruments thanks to its phantom-powered microphone inputs. And I like adding different external pedals. Our pick of the best FRFR speakers for Helix, Kemper, Quad Cortex and other digital amp and effects modellers Included in this guide: 1 Headrush FRFR-112 Check Price 2 Laney LFR-212 Check Price 3 Line 6 Powercab 112 Check Price 4 Kemper Power Kabinet View 5 Friedman ASC-10 View 6 Boss Katana-100 MkII Check Price 7 Line 6 Powercab 212 Plus. Thats because the HX Stomp is trying to pack in all the stuff from the Full Helix with less controls. It also unlocks the Impulse Response Library, where you can transfer IRs to your Quad Cortex and. First of all we will hear the units. With a quad-core DSP and luxurious 7-inch touchscreen, the HeadRush certainly goes all-out on hardware. I loved the fact that the Helix ecosystem has the Helix Native which you get in a great discount when buying one of the Helix products. With a quad-core DSP and luxurious 7-inch touchscreen, the HeadRush certainly goes all-out on hardware. The one feature only the Kemper can match is capturing quality tones of various amp yet the QC can also capture drive pedals etc. There’s a big difference in the price tag between in HX Stomp and the Quad Cortex, but the UI looks miles ahead based off of the videos I have watched. Super ropey start, if you ask me. The Quad Cortex is still the only hardware from Neural DSP, and typically retails around $1850. Other than having buttons and knobs and a colorful LED display, the Cortex doesn't look much like a Helix. In terms of the fidelity and feel of the amps, it's more 'open' and 'full' than most of the Helix models, and the way models respond to playing dynamics seems more subtle and more rich than other top-flight units. I do think Helix is way way better than anything Line 6 has put out before. You can use the same things you'd use on your interface. Intuitive and a lot of very usable patches esp wahs modulation, looper and let’s not forget midi. It’s one of the most powerful modellers around at the moment (I’m sure. When I see a Helix Floor, I don't wonder if it's a GT1000 or a Headrush or an AXE FX or a Space Station. While the Quad Cortex does support an external pedal, you have to purchase it separately and add it to your model. But, the rack version, in order to adhere to the 19’’ rackmount standard, is 483mm in width, while the lunchbox is just a little slimmer at 378mm. But with the Helix, it was easier to dial in a great tone. I do think Helix is way way better than anything Line 6 has put out before. The helix is just such a huge and heavy form factor compared to a switcher and IMO even the helix could use more loops. Quad Cortex vs Helix - Which has MORE accurate AMP MODELING? 9,255 views Sep 7, 2022 John Nathan Cordy 55. Helix is mature now and has many of the same features of QC such as multiple amp blocks and lush effects etc. 4” high frequency driver, for a good top-end response. I’m sure that with the right tweaking the Headrush could come close. The original lunchbox version is the tallest at 217mm in height, whereas the rack version is squashed down to 139mm. I’m a bedroom player and I plug my guitar into my scarlet 2i2 to my computer that’s running a archetype. There are several Helix models available, usually starting at around $599, and going up to $1500 for the high end models. Quad Cortex vs the Helix, and why I sold one of them after I finished filming. The quad cortex comes with a huge touch screen which is about 7 inches wide. The Quad Cortexes effects are fine,. The helix is just such a huge and heavy form factor compared to a switcher and IMO even the helix could use more loops. Even if the QC's modeling were more fleshed out, they are very different in terms of use and key features; QC is much more likely to compete more directly with Helix or FM3 in people's minds. Want to run four amplifier models, stereo reverbs, and a plethora of other effects simultaneously?. The Quad Cortex tends to have more convincing amp tones but if you don't care for the whole modeler and in-ears setup, switching units isn't going to fix that. Not a bad idea, actually, though not really what I had originally had in mind. Quad Cortex of course provides both and that's an attractive feature. The Helix lacks some feel and needs a pedal to help it along so does the Kemper. I have an Apollo (I’m 100% studio bound) interface with many good effects, plus native plugins from Valhalla, U-He, Eventide, etc. When compared to similar models in the market, the Line 6 is slightly more affordable and has better support since Helix is an established brand. I think that the QC captures are a little more accurate than Kemper Profiles and certainly the QC form factor and UI are superior than Kemper, but in my opinion, the QC as a product is not ready for prime time. The Line 6 Helix and Fractal Axe-Fx units (and their various spinoffs) are what I consider closed systems, because you can’t create an entirely new amp model within their space. On the Line 6 Helix is my usual lead patch, the Plini is the Electric Sunrise lead, delays and verbs are in the DAW. It’s fairly similar to the Headrush FRFR speaker and features a 12” driver, plus a 3" voice-coil and 1. Not sure if I will end up selling the Helix, which would mostly be to lighten the crowded floor load and consolidate more than anything else. Price: £1,449/$1,599 Description: High-powered digital modelling effects unit Built-in power amplifier: No Mono or stereo: Stereo Read our Neural DSP Quad Cortex review here. In the same way, it's more practical than an Axe-Fx II, but has a serious rival in the AX8 if you just want a set of sounds simply delivered. The best floorboard FX modelers on the market for all budgets, including gear from Line 6, Boss, and Neural DSP Included in this guide: 1 Neural DSP Quad Cortex Check Price 2 Line 6 Helix LT Check Price 3 Boss GX-100 Check Price 4 Boss GT-1000 Check Price 5 Line 6 Helix HX Effects Check Price 6 TC Electronic Plethora X5 Check Price 7 Zoom G5N. Of all three units, the sounds onboard the Quad Cortex are, to these ears, unmatched. price - you can pick up a helix pretty cheap used compared to quad cortex scanning - quad cortex can scan a rig and replicate it's sound. It’s really hard because Sweetwater is the only U. The Quad Cortex is essentially a computer with a powerful specialised chip for audio. 4K 212K views 2 years ago Finally got to try the Neural DSP Quad Cortex, I'm giving my opinions about the. All of these modelers can sound great if setup correctly. The Helix picks up a slight advantage over the Quad Cortex when it comes to expression based FX as the floor based LT (and above) models feature a built in pedal. The Helix lacks some feel and needs a pedal to help it along so does the Kemper. Neural DSP Quad Cortex. The Kemper has a much smaller LCD display, which is not a touch screen. Clean tones, mid-gain sounds and yes, those snarling high gain stacks all sound incredibly realistic and. Helix Quad Cortex and HX Effects ? Welcome to the Line 6 forums! Apply to Join our Public Beta Testing Program! IMPORTANT SAFETY ALERT: RELAY® G10 TRANSMITTER FIRE HAZARD Limited Support of Legacy Products Impact of Global Materials Shortage Quad Cortex and HX Effects ? By spikey, February 16, 2021in Helix Share More sharing options. The Helix has 38 distortion/overdrive pedals, for example, and the Quad Cortex only has a small selection at present. I thought the Quad Cortex might be a perfect device for me, but as I dig into it, I seem it’s missing a good complement of effects. There are several Helix models available, usually starting at around $599, and going up to $1500 for the high end models. Thats because the HX Stomp is trying to pack in all the stuff from the Full Helix with less controls. The Helix series is a little more affordable than the Quad Cortex. We both agreed pretty emphatically that the Helix sounded better. Seems like that could be the best of all worlds. How does this realistically compare to the Helix? Quad Cortex Blasteroid May 25, 2021, 2:10pm 1 I can’t decide between the Helix Floor or a Quad Cortex. While Kemper's Profiler has the ability to mimic the sound of any amp, the Helix offers a more compact and manageable stage experience than the separate head and controller provide. There are several Helix models available, usually starting at around $599, and going up to $1500 for the high end models. Neural dsp also sounds a little more detailed and smooth and rich to me and generally better than helix. Even if the QC's modeling were more fleshed out, they are very different in terms of use and key features; QC is much more likely to compete more directly with Helix or FM3 in people's minds. 8K 94K views 3 months ago #quadcortex #andertons #kemper Testing and. The amplifier and effects selection pales compared to the Line 6 Helix (or even my old HD500x), Kemper or Axe-Fx III. Kemper vs Quad Cortex vs Helix (you can't tell the difference!) ToneJunkie TV 27. Our pick of the best FRFR speakers for Helix, Kemper, Quad Cortex and other digital amp and effects modellers Included in this guide: 1 Headrush FRFR-112 Check Price 2 Laney LFR-212 Check Price 3 Line 6. The best floorboard FX modelers on the market for all budgets, including gear from Line 6, Boss, and Neural DSP Included in this guide: 1 Neural DSP Quad Cortex Check Price 2 Line 6 Helix LT Check Price 3 Boss GX-100 Check Price 4 Boss GT-1000 Check Price 5 Line 6 Helix HX Effects Check Price 6 TC Electronic Plethora X5 Check. Maybe that’s not a big issue?. Intuitive and a lot of very usable patches esp wahs modulation, looper and let's not forget midi. The Cortex Cloud is cool because you can download amp and pedal captures that other users have shared, but some are better than others. Quad Cortex vs Helix - Which has MORE accurate AMP MODELING? 9,255 views Sep 7, 2022 John Nathan Cordy 55. Helix is mature now and has many of the same features of QC such as multiple amp blocks and lush effects etc. This is why I prefer inside out models like Helix vs. Sounds too good to be true for a quad core modeler. ago It sounded incredibly weak to me, I've seen plenty of bands that use modelers live and sound incredible, but when I used one, it truly did sound fake. retailer so I have not had the opportunity to demo it myself and likely won’t. I'm leaning between Helix, Axe FX3 (FM3) or Quad Cortex. Some more amp and speaker cabinets would be great too (something I know that will happen over time). The recto model in the Helix is not very good IMO. The Line 6 Helix and Fractal Axe-Fx units (and their various spinoffs) are what I consider closed systems, because you can’t create an entirely new amp model within their space. I don’t think is posible for the quad to sound better than fm3. It’s like $800 cheaper to go Helix. As digital modelling has progressed, manufacturers of modelling units, like Kemper, Helix, Quad Cortex, Headrush etc, have gotten incredibly good at replicating the sound and response of amps being played through a variety of speakers. The Quad Cortex is essentially a computer with a powerful specialised chip for audio. Headphones, studio monitors, FRFR, PA, computer speakers, home theater speakers, etc. When I see a Helix Floor, I don't wonder if it's a GT1000 or a Headrush or an AXE FX or a Space Station. price - you can pick up a helix pretty cheap used compared to quad cortex scanning - quad cortex can scan a rig and replicate it's sound. The Quad Cortex is still the only hardware from Neural. The Quad Cortex comes with a fantastic 7 inch LED touchscreen which gave us control over pretty much every feature of the unit. Kemper vs Fractal FM3 vs Helix vs Mooer GE 300 vs HeadRush: which is the best modeler of a SOLDANO?. 7,869 views Jul 3, 2021 Let me start by reminding you THIS VIDEO IS IN NO WAY SPONSORED. Even if the effects choices are a little bland and limited compared with the Kemper and the Helix, the actual sounds themselves are pretty spectacular. Discover Users, Presets, and Neural Captures via the Cortex Mobile app for iOS and Android devices. I tend to favour the Line 6 or Fractal products since they have quite a good reputation in the hardware department and support. The Quad Cortexes effects are fine, but Helix has broader and more experimental offerings. The quad cortex comes with a huge touch screen which is about 7 inches wide. 2K subscribers Subscribe 1 28 views 7 minutes ago Kemper Profiles: https://tonejunkiestore. • Intro Song QUAD CORTEX FOR METAL Ola Englund 793K subscribers Join Subscribe 7. The Helix series is a little more affordable than the Quad Cortex. Is there a way other than the quad cortex to use plugins for live performances? Is the Headrush any good at metalcore/Djent/ambient? They can be had for $650-ish used. TonePilot Member Messages 6,036 Aug 3, 2020 #7 bencyl said:. Programming-wise It is amazing as a control center though. I think the biggest difference is that for the most part, all the amps sound great on Fractal gear (if they're your taste of course) Whereas with the Helix, some are great, some not so much. The Helix has 38 distortion/overdrive pedals, for example, and the Quad Cortex only has a small selection at present. There’s a big difference in the price tag between in HX Stomp and the Quad Cortex, but the UI looks miles ahead based off of the videos I have watched. Helix that's a nice little side stab. The Quad Cortex tends to have more convincing amp tones but if you don't care for the whole modeler and in-ears setup, switching units isn't going to fix that. The full Helix is less reliant on menus because of the additional dial, larger screen, and the capacitive buttons are way more useful since there are significantly more. I have read/listened to probably every Kemper/Helix comparison out there and general consensus seems to be: best sound and feel on Kemper cannot be realy. Helix cannot presets and library - helix. Neural dsp also sounds a little more detailed and smooth and rich to me and generally better than helix. The Helix has 38 distortion/overdrive pedals, for example, and the Quad Cortex only has a small selection at present. Linking your Neural DSP account to your Quad Cortex allows you to create backups, share content, and download items from other users. It just sounded fuller and less digital. While Kemper's Profiler has the ability to mimic the sound of any amp, the Helix offers a more compact and manageable stage experience than the separate head and controller provide. Even if the QC's modeling were more fleshed out, they are very different in terms of use and key features; QC is much more likely to compete more directly with. Tap the Download button on the IRs you'd like to use, or tap the Download all button at the top to download all available IRs to your Quad Cortex at once. Honestly the best way to edit patches on the HX Stomp is the PC Editor. It sounds fantastic in demos I. I think it's an amazing advantage over the other competitors since it's so valuable for recording and the much easier re-amping. 9kg, it's substantial enough not to skid around the stage when used as a standalone unit and, though we've seen forum. The Helix lacks some feel and needs a pedal to help it along so does the Kemper. The Quad Cortex shouldn't really be part of this conversation. 2K subscribers Subscribe 1 28 views 7 minutes ago Kemper Profiles:. 1K subscribers For TrueFire courses and All Access. I got the Kemper, Helix and Quad Cortex sounding so close you can’t tell the difference. Click to expand You are going to trick me into watching that video!!!!. 43K views 1 year ago #QuadCortex #Helix In this video we will share a direct comparison between the Line 6 Helix Floor vs the Neural DSP Quad Cortex. That seems to be one thing that reviewers agree on. Quad Cortex. Pick one and see if it works for you. All of the controls on the Kemper are adjusted with physical buttons, switches and dials. Of all three units, the sounds onboard the Quad. I think some of that comes from them having been around a lot longer. Check out our full Helix vs Quad Cortex head to head here. When compared to similar models in the market, the Line 6 is. To really answer your question though the main reason I didn’t go with the Axe FX is price. 43K views 1 year ago #QuadCortex #Helix In this video we will share a direct comparison between the Line 6 Helix Floor vs the Neural DSP Quad Cortex. Other than having buttons and knobs and a colorful LED display, the Cortex doesn't look much like a Helix. The quad cortex should be interesting, and they’ve hinted that they want to. Anything hifi or full frequency that you'd listen to music or watch TV or play video games on. The Helix series is a little more affordable than the Quad Cortex. Quad Cortex is the most powerful floor modeler on the planet. This is what customers who viewed this product bought bought This item exactly £1,666 bought Headrush Prime £1,059 bought Line6 HX. Quad Cortex vs Helix vs Kemper - A Guitarist's Guide Published on 16 September 2022 Are you considering a digital modeller for playing, recording or gigging?. Even if the QC's modeling were more fleshed out, they are very different in terms of use and key features; QC is much more likely to compete more directly with Helix or FM3 in people's minds. If anything, it looks kinda like that Chinese modeler I referred to. Even if the effects choices are a little bland and limited compared with the Kemper and the Helix, the actual sounds themselves are pretty spectacular. So in my opinion, if you care more about amps and gain tone get the Quad Cortex. Quad Cortex is the most powerful floor modeler on the planet. The Quad Cortex comes with a fantastic 7 inch LED touchscreen which gave us control over pretty much every feature of the unit. Something as basic as separating midi commands in scenes mode from stompbox mode nope.